Qatar Airways Group has turned in a huge full-year operating loss, exceeding $500 million, exacerbated by a heavy share of losses at its Air Italy division. Group passenger revenues were up by 14% to QR34.1 billion and cargo revenues rose to just over QR10 billion for the year to 31 March. But fuel costs, in particular, hit the Middle Eastern carrier hard, surging by 36% to QR18.1 billion, the highest individual contribution to operating expenses of QR50 billion. This resulted in an operating loss of almost QR1.85 billion ($508 million), the company’s consolidated accounts show. Qatar Airways Group took a 49% interest in the parent company of Air Italy in September 2017. The accounts show that Air Italy generated a QR542 million ($149 million) loss for the financial year, of which the Qatar Airways Group share amounts to QR265.5 million. Air Italy’s revenues for the period reached QR1.2 billion. Losses from the Italian carrier were only partially offset by a QR50 million share in profits from participation in three other ventures, mainly relating to facilities management.
Qatar Airways Group claims it has “underlying robust financial health” despite the “continued illegal airspace blockade” from a number of states in the Gulf region. Group chief Akbar Al Baker says the company experienced a year of “achievement in the face of adversity” and “challenges that are unparalleled in the airline industry”. Qatar Airways Group posted a net loss of QR2.3 billion, which Al Baker describes as “disappointing”, blaming the withdrawal of mature routes, higher fuel costs, and currency exchange fluctuations.

Source: FlightGlobal

Investigators are probing an incident in which a Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787-9 executed a missed approach after being informed by air traffic control that the undercarriage was not deployed. The aircraft had been operating to Melbourne on 19 September, having departed from Ho Chi Minh City. “During approach to land, Melbourne air traffic control advised the crew that the aircraft’s landing-gear was observed not to be extended,” says the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. The aircraft had been conducting its approach to runway 34, and executed a go-around. Visibility at the time – around 08:04 – was good, and there was no adverse weather, according to meteorological data from the airport. Investigators have not disclosed the altitude of the 787 or its distance from touchdown at the point when the undercarriage advisory was transmitted. The flight, after carrying out the missed approach, landed around 15min later. The bureau says it will “obtain information from the flightcrew and additional information as required”.

Source: FlightGlobal

Scandinavian operator SAS is offering passengers the opportunity to purchase biofuel as part of the airline’s sustainability strategy. The initiative is a not-for-profit service, simply adding to biofuels already being bought by the airline. Customers will be able to purchase 20min “blocks” of flight time powered by biofuel, says SAS, on a per-passenger basis. The price is currently fixed at $10 or €10 for a block. Passengers will have the option of buying biofuel when booking tickets and subsequently in the run-up to departure.“The amount of biofuel will not necessarily be used on the actual flight the traveler has bought a ticket for,” the airline points out. “But it will be used to replace fossil jet fuel to the equivalent amount in SAS’s operations.” SAS states that volumes of biofuel being produced are “not enough” – and prices are three or four times higher than conventional fuel – and that it wants to “pioneer a large-scale and competitive market for biofuel” through the new ancillary product. “We are now inviting our travellers to be part of the transition to a more sustainable way of travelling,” says SAS executive vice-president, commercial, Karl Sandlund. SAS’s environmental policy includes a target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 25% by 2030. “This product makes it easier for our customers to contribute to this development,” says Sandlund. “It also shows the additional costs of biofuel today and highlights the need for an increased supply of commercial biofuel.”

Source: FlightGlobal