EASA looking at environmental labelling for airlines
February 24, 2021
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency is looking to introduce an environmental labelling scheme that could require airlines to publish greater information on the carbon imprint of their operations. "We can confirm that EASA has the intention of introducing an environmental label for aviation". "It is not, however, foreseen that airlines will be obliged to display carbon emission data, or any other information from such a label, on tickets or during the booking process." Still, the agency is hopeful that information will be "distributed in a way that really benefits the consumer in making more sustainable air travel choices". German newspaper Welt am Sonntag had reported that EASA was seeking tenders for a classification system to rank flights and aircraft by their carbon footprint. The label concept is "still at the very early stages of development". Discussions are ongoing with stakeholders, including airlines."The main driver behind this initiative is to provide clear and credible information with regards to the environmental impact of aviation which is currently missing, often leading to confusion and mistrust," adds the agency.
New Zealand bans PW4000-powered 777s from airspace
February 24, 2021
New Zealand's Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has temporarily banned Pratt & Whitney PW4000-powered Boeing 777 aircraft from operating in its airspace. “We are issuing a NOTAM today which effectively prevents this aircraft type from landing or taking off within New Zealand domestic airspace or transiting through it," CAA’s deputy chief executive aviation safety, Dean Winter says in a statement today. CAA says this follows the recent engine failure of a United Airlines aircraft with the same profile, on 20 January. The incident occurred during flight 328 from Denver to Honolulu. The aircraft made a successful emergency landing and there were no injuries. Data shows that the aircraft, bearing registration N772UA (MSN 26930), is a 1995-built, 777-200 fitted with PW4077 engines. CAA's Winter states: “We are taking this action out of an abundance of caution to prevent any potential threat to people or property should another engine experience a similar fan blade failure like the incident in Denver." He adds: “We have quickly joined the aviation regulators in the United Kingdom and Japan in taking this action. We also note Boeing has recommended the suspension of all 777 with the affected engines until the cause of this failure is known. We anticipate that an emergency airworthiness directive will be issued by the USA’s Federal Aviation Administration to further clarify and take action on this situation.” He further states: “We are quite satisfied that there is enough evidence to take this action in the interest of keeping New Zealand’s skies safe and secure.” CAA says there are no PW4000-powered 777 aircraft operated by New Zealand-based airlines. Data shows that United Airlines is the largest operator of PW4000-powered 777s, and its in-service and stored fleet of 52 777-200s average 22.5 years old. ANA is the next largest operator, with 15 777-200s and seven -300s in its existing fleet. Korean Air operates 16 777s and its low-cost affiliate Jin Air operates another four; Japan Airlines has 13 in its fleet. These operators also have a mix of -200s and -300s.
Dutch probe shedding of 747F engine parts over Maastricht
February 23, 2021
Dutch investigators have opened an initial probe into an incident in which a Boeing 747-400 freighter apparently shed engine parts after departure from Maastricht. The aircraft had “engine problems” and lost several metal parts after it took off from Maastricht-Aachen airport on 20 February, before diverting to Liege, says the South Limburg arm of safety co-ordination authority Veiligheidsregio. Metal parts fell in the Sint Josephstraat district of Meerssen, which lies between the city and the airport, about 2km along the extended centreline of runway 21. “Two people were slightly injured. One of them was taken to hospital,” the authority adds. ”Several cars and houses were damaged.” While the Dutch Safety Board has not formally identified the aircraft involved, it appears to be a Longtail Aviation 747-400 converted freighter. The aircraft – provisionally identified as VQ-BWT, originally delivered in 1991 to Singapore Airlines – took off from Maastricht for New York at about 16:10. According to fleets data it is fitted with Pratt & Whitney PW4056 engines, from the same powerplant range – although a different model – as the PW4077 engine involved in the United Airlines Boeing 777 uncontained failure event over Denver on the same day. Maastricht airport’s operator says an “engine fire started” after the 747 departed and it “lost debris” over Meerssen before landing in Liege. The Dutch Safety Board says it has commenced an “exploratory investigation” into the event – a month after it started looking into the shedding of an underside fuselage panel of another 747-400 freighter which had been climbing to cruise altitude over the Netherlands. South Limburg’s safety authority says the police have requested any debris found to be left alone, and that damage to vehicles or other property should be reported to insurance companies.